Because the approach one takes to the book of revelation dramatically affects ones exegetical conclusions, it is necessary that i explain the reasons i take the approach i do. In this preterist commentary on revelation 17 jerusalem is not just called the whore of babylon she is also depicted as a whore in highly suggestive sexual imagery illustrating jerusalem, the whore of babylon, in the act of adultery. The book of revelation starts with this is a revelation from jesus christ, which god gave him to show his servants the events that must soon take place. The preterist view of the end times is based on a symbolic view of the book of revelation that holds most of its prophecies have already been fulfilled.
Very important we note this and realize we cannot study revelation in the same way we study the book of romans. New catholic book of revelation free course taylor marshall. An issue that must be addressed before proceeding to an examination of the text of revelation is our basic hermeneutical approach to the book. This literary style is ancient poetry that wrapsup real events in. The book of revelation often called the revelation to john, apocalypse of john, the revelation from jesus christ from its opening words, the apocalypse, the revelation, or simply revelation is the final book of the new testament, and consequently is also the final book of the christian bible. The preterist approach to revelation the unfolding of. This is the prevailing view among modern scholars who arent aligned with orthodox christianity. The dispensational, futurist view of bible prophecy is correct. You can expect a catholic, liturgical, biblical, patristic treatment of the book of revelation bor.
Jul 16, 2015 thoughout the history of the church, there have always been those who maintained that the colorful and powerful images of revelation refer largely to events that took place in the first century. The book is a compilation by four christians two in africa and two in the usa who have put the four major eschatological viewpoints into laymens terms each author stated his view in response to a series of questions about eschatology the endtimes. A commentary on revelation the preterist archive of. Preterist means past in fulfillment, and futurist means future in fulfillment. John, identified as one who bore witness to the word of god, and to the testimony of jesus christ. Introduction some general comments about the book of revelation and its uniqueness. They do insist however, that the principal of literal interpretation be followed consistently throughout the book. This deals with the evidence for determining the early pre70 date of the book of revelation. So they deny that jesus will return at the consummation of the age. For that reason, many wouldbe students have become discouraged in their attempt to discern its message. Rome ruled the world and the emperor was known as the beast. He is known for his vestigatio arcani sensus in apocalypsi 1614 published after his death, putting forward what would later be called a preterist view of biblical prophecy, in commentary on the book of revelation. Four views on the book of revelation counterpoints. Thomas ice, gives what christians should know about the false new teaching that the book of revelation and most of bible prophecy has already been fulfilled.
The outline employed in this paper is a modification of what was learned from s. What is the preterist interpretation of revelation. Futurists believe most endtime prophecies especially the big three events the second coming, resurrection, and judgment are yet to be fulfilled. The new jerusalem the covenantal habitation of the saints ulrich beeson. These were added later to aid readers in citing and lookingup relevant passages. Author, date, purpose, key verse, and outline of the book. The preterist view the book refers to events that were fulfilled in the first century a. The truth is, some teachers of the book of revelation have set a bad example. The four views and their proponents are 1 the preterist view, by kenneth l. The book of revelation is a series of six independent visions. Thoughout the history of the church, there have always been those who maintained that the colorful and powerful images of revelation refer largely to events that took place in the first century. This perspective understands that most of the images described by john are symbolic descriptions of the events that led up to the fall of jerusalem and the destruction of the temple by imperial rome in ad70.
Since the temple and city were both destroyed in 70 a. Preterist changed the date of the book of revelation from 9095 ad to 6570 ad to fit their false teachings. I also looking foreward toward the revelation project of kenneth gentry. One commentary, an irish book of questions on the gospels, written about 725, interpreted christ s coming in matthew 24 in light of the judean war, as a coming in judgment through the roman armies. No book of the bible is more puzzling to the average bible reader than revelation. Jul 11, 2017 the following chapterbychapter outline of the book of revelation is from a partial preterist perspective. Four common views of interpreting the book preterist, historicist, futurist, idealist d. The book of revelation did not start out as a book.
Barrick, the testimony of jesus in the book of revelation 10. The preterist interpretation of scripture regards the book of revelation as a symbolic picture of firstcentury conflicts, not a description of what will occur in the end times. Elder charles taylor primitive baptist 1996 a short sketch and the desires of the author. The theme to the book of revelation was the second coming of jesus against the apostate jews in a. This is known as the quick fix of 96 for if revelation was written under domitians reign then the preterist view has a problem. Aug 27, 2006 i also gonne order both, and maybe in the future also the 3rd one. A biblical analysis of the false doctrine of preterism. He has served churches in north carolina, georgia, texas, and tennessee. Bible and theology kindle edition by zondervan, pate, c. All biblical interpreters understand that certain prophecies have been fulfilled, but preterists differ in that they interpret a greater portion of scripture as already having come to pass. This relatively brief study outline with questions and comments is designed to be an introduction to the book of revelation.
As more and more people become serious students of last things, the number of those investigating preterism is constantly increasing. He was ordained to the full work of the gospel ministry in 1959. Preterist the term preterist means that which has gone by. It was written primarily to encourage the original readers. The book of revelation introduction the revelation of jesus christ, which god gave him to show his servantsthings which must shortly take place. The word preterist past is used in different ways, but here we use it to refer to one who believes the book of revelation. What this book reveals or unveils is jesus christ in glory. From irenaeus work, against heresies, book 5, chapter 30. This does not mean that all of the prophecies in the book have already been fulfilled. Ill be covering the preterist, historical, and futurist interpretation of the apocalypse dont worry i explain these terms in the first course. Hence, there is a recurring need to set forth the first principles of the preterist interpretation of scripture. Book of revelation for dummies cheat sheet dummies. The following chapterbychapter outline of the book of revelation is from a partialpreterist perspective.
In the preterist view, the book of revelation was for then. The book of revelation the preterist archive of realized. In all its uses, revelation refers to something or someone, once hidden, becoming visible. His commentary on the book of revelation, written while a mild preterist, takes revelation rev. Now before we proceed further with our studies of the book of revelation, i would like to provide you with an outline of the book as a useful guide to your study. This definitely limits the events of matthew 24 and revelation 11 to the forty odd year period following jesus ascension. We arrive at a date in the second half of ad 62, before hebrews and 2nd peter were written. This approach believes that revelation is a sweeping, disordered panorama of all church history. It is a return to a prefall edenlike environment free from the cursed earth that began at the fall of man.
The book of revelation closes with the bright and morning star, which is a figure of christ at his coming to take the church out of the world. Four view outline of the book of revelation 2009 if taken literally, this is the brand new earth after its destruction and new jerusalem is the eternal dwelling place of believers with god. This is known as the quick fix of 96 for if revelation was written. What is the futurist interpretation of the book of revelation. Gumerlock, writing in his book revelation and the first century, states that luis alcasars commentary on revelation, published in 1614, was not the first to take a preterist approach to the main body of the apocalypse chs. The other three systems are the historicist, the preterist, and the spiritual or idealist.
The basic premise of the futurist viewpoint is that the majority of the prophecies in. Copeland sermons from the book of revelation 6 the book of revelation. Iam just listening to his studies mp3 on revelation, and iam becoming more and more convince of the the partial preterist view of revelation. Date of revelation ad 62 international preterist association. It is a book filled with symbols, figures, and strange imagery. Preterism denies the future, literal fulfillment of most of its predictions, focusing instead on allegory and symbolism. I believe that the book itself demands a basically preterist approach. He sent an angel to present this revelation to his servant john. It is the first book that many new to the bible want to study, while it is often neglected by mature. Futurist the events prophesied in the new testament are in the future perhaps having some partial fulfillment in past events with notable the exception of the siege of jerusalem and destruction of the temple which occurred in 70 ad. Preterist scholars quickly recognize that dating the book in 95 or 96 ad utterly destroys their theory, therefore, they must challenge this dating. Preterist view the book of revelation relates only to the events of the day in which it was written.
The preterist interpretation of scripture regards the book of revelation as a symbolic picture of firstcentury conflicts, not a. Do preterist teachings line up with the book of revelation. I have read the preterist view point and find the scholarship very lacking. The book of revelation, often called the book of revelations, revelation to john, apocalypse of john, the revelation, or simply revelation, the revelation from jesus christ from its opening words or the apocalypse, is the final book of the new testament, and therefore also the final book of the christian bible. This view of revelation is supported in the outline provided in the book itself revelation 1. And the book of revelation will complete the revelation of.
What is the futurist interpretation of the book of. Brief explanation of partial preterism pursuing truth. The revelation of christ revelation 15 the prologue the introduction resource. But, the book of revelation, more so than any other book of the bible, is a book about him. D they point out incorrectly that revelation was written in 95 or 96 a. The term preterism is based on the latin preter, which means past.
According to preterism, all prophecy in the bible is really history. Aug, 2009 partial preterism sees matthew 24, matthew 25. Was the preterist interpretation of revelation invented by. Heaven as gods dwelling place and earth mans dwelling are now merged. When confronted with the preterist view of eschatology people often say, wasnt the book of revelation written after 70 a. Full preterism believes jesus already returned in 70 ad. This school of thought interprets the book of daniel as referring to events that happened from the 7th century bc until the first century ad, while seeing the prophecies of revelation as events that happened in the first century ad. The postmillennial view the four keys to the millennium. We date the book in relation to a number of factors, including internal and external considerations. So begins the book of revelation, one of the most challenging books of the bible.
I wrote this series for a book that was published in the republic of south africa. Over the course of the churchs history there have been four main approaches. Preterists believe the dating of the book of revelation is of vital importance and that it was written before the destruction of jerusalem in ad 70. It is a revelation or an unveiling of the person, the purposes, the plans, the power, and the promotion of the lord jesus christ. While debated by some, he was most likely the apostle john, brother of james, and author of the gospel of john and three epistles. Preterism, a christian eschatological view, interprets some partial preterism or all full preterism prophecies of the bible as events which have already happened. The partialpreterist commentarys on the book of revelation. Preterism and the date of revelation the preterist. This book allows proponents of each of the four major interpretive views on revelation to present an overview from their perspective. I also gonne order both, and maybe in the future also the 3rd one. Truths about him and his final victory, that the rest of scripture merely allude to, become clearly visible through revelation about jesus christ see historical and theological themes. I am just finishing a manuscript commentary on eschatology and.
It affirms the completion of all nt books by the time. The book of revelation, a prophecy of warning and hope. The phrases they who pierced him and all the tribes of the land are two familiar designations for old covenant israel. Book of revelation explained scripture by scripture.
Preterist interpretation commentary a testimony of. International preterist association preterist past. It was concerning the coming destruction of jerusalem in ad 70. I realize the covenant theology preterist group will select before a. In the historicist approach, revelation predicts the future, but the future of the church age not the future of endtime events. Preterism holds that the contents of revelation constitute a prophecy of events that were fulfilled in the 1st century. The rapture is the hope of the new testament, just as the revelation of christ was the hope of the old testament. Iam just listening to his studies mp3 on revelation, and iam becoming more and more convince of the the partialpreterist view of revelation.
This literary style is ancient poetry that wrapsup real events in poetic symbolism to give these events meaning. Enduring word bible commentary revelation chapter 1. Preterist basically means the opposite of futurist. This view sees the seal, trumpet, and bowl judgments as prefiguring the second coming of christ.
It is hoped the student will gain a feeling for apocalyptic writings which are found in revelation. Download it once and read it on your kindle device, pc, phones or tablets. Preterism understands certain eschatological passages which are yet future as having already been fulfilled. Detailed outline of the book of revelation david aune from revelation in word biblical commentary dallas, tx. As we study revelation we are also comparing the popular futurist viewpoint with the less popular, but more historic partialpreterist viewpoint.
Revelation speaks of things that are already history. It is important to remember that the book of revelation like the rest of the bible was not originally subdivided into verses and chapters. Elder charles taylor was born in blount county, tennessee, january 12, 1921. Apocalyptic literature is a type of writing containing symbols and visions. The futurist interpretation of the book of revelation is one of four approaches to understanding the prophecies of revelation. It was a letter written by the apostle john in ad 68 to the 7 literal churches in ancient greece. John henten wrote his comments almost a century before the publication of alcasars commentary.
1486 900 716 113 323 802 297 1042 801 203 1435 13 128 904 578 100 1389 36 1352 454 168 896 1395 677 903 155 881 1307 1154 837 1304 1325 154